It's a lot of work, to be certain, but I think the results make it worth the work. You're guaranteed to get a package that does just what you want and has no unintended side effects. Personally, when I need to package applications as MSIs I use the WiX Toolset to build a package from the ground up. If the application's setup has unattended installation and removal options I prefer a script-based install using those options over a repackage. Unless you embark on a huge reverse-engineering effort you really can't be 100% sure that the package you create does exactly what the manufacturer's setup does. I try to avoid repackaging applications whenever possible. Generally I find that packages created by these tools end up having "noise" in them that ends up needing to be cleaned out manually. Thus, MSI files can be installed on remote computers, without needing the user’s attendance. is a program that can automatically generate Windows installers, based on the given parameters. These tools seek to do something that, for very simple applications, is probably feasible but, for an application of any sufficient complexity, is likely not. EMCO MSI Package Builder 7.3.5 Build 4661 Crack + Serial Keygen Download. Repackaging tools have generally not worked well for me. Product recommendations are off-topic for this site, so you're not going to get any specific recommendations here. Google Chrome is already available as an MSI so no repackaging is necessary.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |